[Image: Shemar Moore, a brown-skinned, slender man with close-cropped black hair and a slight beard.]
isabelthespy:

quixotess:

danigirl0207:

“I didn’t understand the whole Shemar-is-sexy thing at first because my initial encounter with him was on the phone. Then he walked into a rehearsal and I was, like, look at this man! But here’s the thing with Shemar: You’d think the appeal is how handsome he is, but what’s unbelievable is, it’s actually his charm, his attentiveness. He listens, which is so rare for a man. And he notices everything. ‘You changed your nail polish,’ he’ll say. Or if we’re out at an event and he spots women giggling and staring at him, he’ll walk straight over and kiss them on the hand or give them hugs. Both on the show and in life, he’s like that sexy older brother of your friend, the one who’s got it all together and just looks supercool in a leather jacket.”
~Costar Kirsten Vangsness

Wow. Yeah, that does sound like his character as well. I always thought he sort of seemed like he was playing a version of himself. (Kirsten also kind of gives me that impression, haha.)

i want to be best friends with the whole cast of this show is that so wrong

I agree with quixotess on both counts (Kirsten’s playing a twee-er, more straight version). 
The first time I ever set eyes on an image of Shemar Moore was in the mid-’90s when he was a guest on Dini Petty, a Canadian daytime talk show. I remember it because it was the first time I ever heard the expression “24/7”. Shemar Moore: always educational.

[Image: Shemar Moore, a brown-skinned, slender man with close-cropped black hair and a slight beard.]

isabelthespy:

quixotess:

danigirl0207:

“I didn’t understand the whole Shemar-is-sexy thing at first because my initial encounter with him was on the phone. Then he walked into a rehearsal and I was, like, look at this man! But here’s the thing with Shemar: You’d think the appeal is how handsome he is, but what’s unbelievable is, it’s actually his charm, his attentiveness. He listens, which is so rare for a man. And he notices everything. ‘You changed your nail polish,’ he’ll say. Or if we’re out at an event and he spots women giggling and staring at him, he’ll walk straight over and kiss them on the hand or give them hugs. Both on the show and in life, he’s like that sexy older brother of your friend, the one who’s got it all together and just looks supercool in a leather jacket.”

~Costar Kirsten Vangsness

Wow. Yeah, that does sound like his character as well. I always thought he sort of seemed like he was playing a version of himself. (Kirsten also kind of gives me that impression, haha.)

i want to be best friends with the whole cast of this show is that so wrong

I agree with quixotess on both counts (Kirsten’s playing a twee-er, more straight version). 

The first time I ever set eyes on an image of Shemar Moore was in the mid-’90s when he was a guest on Dini Petty, a Canadian daytime talk show. I remember it because it was the first time I ever heard the expression “24/7”. Shemar Moore: always educational.

isabelthespy:

karnythia:

Indian couple have children taken away by Norwegian social workers because they fed them with their hands, slept in same bed

notyourkinddear:

mehreenkasana:

mynameisjuthika:

fumblingtowardshappiness:

jonathan-cunningham:

An Indian couple have had their children taken away by Norwegian social workers because they were feeding them with their hands and sleeping in the same bed as them.

Anurup and Sagarika Bhattacharya lost custody of their three-year-old son and one-year-old daughter eight months ago after authorities branded their behaviour inappropriate.

The drastic measure led to intervention from the Indian government who contacted Norwegian authorities in an a desperate attempt to return the children.

Norwegian Child Protection Services removed the youngsters from their home in May, 2011, leaving their parents horrified with the outcome of the report.

Father Anurup told Indian television channel NDTV: ‘They told me ”why are you sleeping with the children in the same bed?’’. 

‘(I told them) this is also a purely cultural issue. We never leave the children in another room and say goodnight to them.’

Anurup added: ‘Feeding a child with the hand is normal in Indian tradition and when the mother is feeding with a spoon there could be phases when she was overfeeding the child. 

They said it was force feeding. These are basically cultural differences.

Mrs Bhattacharya said: ‘My son was sleeping with my husband. They said he should sleep separately from your son.’

The parents have been told that they can only see their children twice a year, for an hour during each visit until the kids turn 18 when they will no longer be bound by the current restrictions under current Norwegian law.

Despite the Indian government’s intervention, Norwegian officials are refusing to meet the request for any further explanation.

The Norwegian government has taken these people’s children and now will not allow them to see each other, over simple xenophobia. Absolutely tragic. 

what the fuck?

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME.

Wow.

I just want to add that this shit is NORMAL and happens in other Western countries. Brown & Black parents in the U.S. that want to give birth at home are forced to give birth in the hospital under threat of losing all their children. Co-sleeping is so frowned on that community health nurses are telling parents that it is “abuse” and requiring to see that parents have a crib set up. I am seeing so many examples of the government, medical establishment, & social workers getting into the middle of people’s choices for how they birth/raise their children that it is truly frightening. And the frequency with which this is turned upon dirt poor white people and POC - especially when we are talking about practices that are normal in our cultures - is downright common.

Am I the only one wondering how light these kids are & how cute? Because given the agency’s justification that the 4 month old doesn’t look at Mom so there’s a lack of emotional attachment, I’m thinking of all the “rescued brown child & gave to a nice white family” adoption stories.

this story is making me fucking sick. two hours a year? i want to throw up.

What in the actual fuck.

"Over a century ago Thomas Edison got the patent for a device which would “do for the eye what the phonograph does for the ear”. He called it the Kinetoscope. He was not only amongst the first to record video, he was also the first person to own the copyright to a motion picture.

Because of Edisons patents for the motion pictures it was close to financially impossible to create motion pictures in the North american east coast. The movie studios therefor relocated to California, and founded what we today call Hollywood. The reason was mostly because there was no patent. There was also no copyright to speak of, so the studios could copy old stories and make movies out of them - like Fantasia, one of Disneys biggest hits ever.

So, the whole basis of this industry, that today is screaming about losing control over immaterial rights, is that they circumvented immaterial rights. They copied (or put in their terminology: “stole”) other peoples creative works, without paying for it. They did it in order to make a huge profit. Today, they’re all successful and most of the studios are on the Fortune 500 list of the richest companies in the world. Congratulations - it’s all based on being able to re-use other peoples creative works. And today they hold the rights to what other people create. If you want to get something released, you have to abide to their rules. The ones they created after circumventing other peoples rules.

The reason they are always complaining about “pirates” today is simple. We’ve done what they did. We circumvented the rules they created and created our own. We crushed their monopoly by giving people something more efficient. We allow people to have direct communication between each other, circumventing the profitable middle man, that in some cases take over 107% of the profits (yes, you pay to work for them).

It’s all based on the fact that we’re competition. We’ve proven that their existence in their current form is no longer needed. We’re just better than they are.

And the funny part is that our rules are very similar to the founding ideas of the USA. We fight for freedom of speech. We see all people as equal. We believe that the public, not the elite, should rule the nation. We believe that laws should be created to serve the public, not the rich corporations.

The Pirate Bay is truly an international community. The team is spread all over the globe - but we’ve stayed out of the USA. We have Swedish roots and a swedish friend said this: The word SOPA means “trash” in Swedish. The word PIPA means “a pipe” in Swedish. This is of course not a coincidence. They want to make the internet inte a one way pipe, with them at the top, shoving trash through the pipe down to the rest of us obedient consumers.

The public opinion on this matter is clear. Ask anyone on the street and you’ll learn that no one wants to be fed with trash. Why the US government want the american people to be fed with trash is beyond our imagination but we hope that you will stop them, before we all drown.

SOPA can’t do anything to stop TPB. Worst case we’ll change top level domain from our current .org to one of the hundreds of other names that we already also use. In countries where TPB is blocked, China and Saudi Arabia springs to mind, they block hundreds of our domain names. And did it work? Not really.

To fix the “problem of piracy” one should go to the source of the problem. The entertainment industry say they’re creating “culture” but what they really do is stuff like selling overpriced plushy dolls and making 11 year old girls become anorexic. Either from working in the factories that creates the dolls for basically no salary or by watching movies and tv shows that make them think that they’re fat.

In the great Sid Meiers computer game Civilization you can build Wonders of the world. One of the most powerful ones is Hollywood. With that you control all culture and media in the world. Rupert Murdoch was happy with MySpace and had no problems with their own piracy until it failed. Now he’s complaining that Google is the biggest source of piracy in the world - because he’s jealous. He wants to retain his mind control over people and clearly you’d get a more honest view of things on Wikipedia and Google than on Fox News.

Some facts (years, dates) are probably wrong in this press release. The reason is that we can’t access this information when Wikipedia is blacked out. Because of pressure from our failing competitors. We’re sorry for that."

PIRATE BAY, PRESS RELEASE  (18 JANUARY 2012). 
(Found via pipperipembo.)
BOOM!  (via tobia)

Verrrry interesting.

)

(via justwannaeat)

kelsium:

Bitches be paying lots of money to look like they don’t give a shit and the New York Times is ON IT.

meghanalefae:

aprilstar-dance:

SOPA Emergency IP list:         

So if these ass-fucks in DC decide to
ruin the internet, here’s how to access your favorite sites
 in the event of a DNS takedown

tumblr.com 174.121.194.34
wikipedia.org 208.80.152.201

# News
bbc.co.uk 212.58.241.131
aljazeera.com 198.78.201.252

# Social media
reddit.com 72.247.244.88
imgur.com 173.231.140.219
google.com 74.125.157.99
youtube.com 74.125.65.91
yahoo.com 98.137.149.56
hotmail.com 65.55.72.135
bing.com 65.55.175.254
digg.com 64.191.203.30
theonion.com 97.107.137.164
hush.com 65.39.178.43
gamespot.com 216.239.113.172
ign.com 69.10.25.46
cracked.com 98.124.248.77
sidereel.com 144.198.29.112
github.com 207.97.227.239

# Torrent sites
thepiratebay.org 194.71.107.15
mininova.com 80.94.76.5
btjunkie.com 93.158.65.211
demonoid.com 62.149.24.66
demonoid.me 62.149.24.67

# Social networking
facebook.com 69.171.224.11
twitter.com 199.59.149.230
tumblr.com 174.121.194.34
livejournal.com 209.200.154.225
dreamwidth.org 69.174.244.50

# Live Streaming Content
stickam.com 67.201.54.151
blogtv.com 84.22.170.149
justin.tv 199.9.249.21
chatroulette.com 184.173.141.231
omegle.com 97.107.132.144
own3d.tv 208.94.146.80
megavideo.com 174.140.154.32

# Television
gorillavid.com 178.17.165.74
videoweed.com 91.220.176.248
novamov.com 91.220.176.248
tvlinks.com 208.223.219.206
1channel.com 208.87.33.151

# Shopping
amazon.com 72.21.211.176
newegg.com 216.52.208.187
frys.com 209.31.22.39

# File Sharing
mediafire.com 205.196.120.13
megaupload.com 174.140.154.20
fileshare.com 208.87.33.151
multiupload.com 95.211.149.7
uploading.com 195.191.207.40
warez-bb.org 31.7.57.13
hotfile.com 199.7.177.218
gamespy.com 69.10.25.46
what.cd 67.21.232.223
warez.ag 178.162.238.136
putlocker.com 89.238.130.247
uploaded.to 95.211.143.200
dropbox.com 199.47.217.179
pastebin.com 69.65.13.216


Here’s a tip for the do-it-yourself crowd:
Go to your computer’s Start menu, and either go to
 “run” or just search for “cmd.”
Open it up, and type in “ping [website address],”


Once you have the IP for a website, all you really
need to do is enter it like you would
a normal URL nd hit enter/press go. Typing in
 “208.85.240.231”
should bring you to the front page of AO3,
 for example, just as typing “174.121.194.34/dashboard”
should bring you straight to your Tumblr dashboard.
Since we’re obviously bracing for the worst case scenario
which would involve you not being
able to access the internet regularly, you should,
 save this list.

Dear Tumblr-ers, -ites, ettes, and whatever other things you may prefer,

Please reblog the crap out of this. Add to it if you feel there is stuff necessary but missing.

P.S. Thank you to the lovely who wrote this up.

(via rubyvroom)

isabelthespy:

ironstring:

dumbthingswhitepplsay:

alexandraerin:

ashleyfullstop:

sylviasybil:

alexandraerin:

fallingaparttocuttime:

no okay but here’s the thing about language.

it’s one thing to police spelling and grammar; it’s a douchebag thing to do, especially if you’re using it as a means of refuting an argument (“you spelled that word wrong, therefore…

and yet, I cannot abide some things. the meaning of “literally” must not be allowed to become “figuratively.”

First, a nitpick. Nobody uses literally to mean figuratively. They aren’t throwing the word “literally” into the sentence “I was floored” so that you will understand they mean “not really, but the figurative connotation of floored.” They know you will understand that anyway.

No, they use literally figuratively as an intensifier, in the same sense that we use really or totally or definitely, and it works for all the same reasons those do.

Now I understand the thinking behind the embargo of literally used figuratively as a figurative bridge that literally cannot be crossed, but I can’t support it. Because words don’t work like that. They do not contain the properties of their meanings within themselves. By that I mean to say that the word fire is not hot to the touch. The word bright does not illuminate words around it or hurt to look at. Typing the word heavy on a page doesn’t increase its weight by more than the weight of its ink would do so.

And thus the word literally does not itself possess the property of literalness. 

We can say “that really hurt” and it’s understood that we aren’t literally saying that what distinguishes this pain from other pain is that other pain was false. We can use seriously or truly or definitely or any other word that connotes truthfulness or precision and use it figuratively to mean an intensifier.

Literally just seems to be a logical continuation of that trend, and it has no downside because of the aforementioned wonderfully flexible ability of the human brain to parse different meanings for the same word.

Think of it this way: if someone says “I was literally floored.”, they want you to picture them doing a cartoon take of being knocked to the floor. That’s not what literally happened (notice how easily you parsed that I meant the literal definition of literal there), of course, but that’s the impression they wish to convey. Not that they were simply floored in the usual sense of the word, not just merely floored but really-quite-sincerely floored. The figurative use of literal is a concise way of conveying this.

BOOM

!!!

literally already “means” what this person is scared of it meaning. there’s no stopping it! it’s one of my favorite words for this very reason. 

well played.

Beautiful.

Because it’s never a bad time for a triptych of Gabourey Sidibe in glam mode.

(Source: forget-why, via buttahlove)

popculturebrain:

New Image: The Hunger Games | Collider

[Image: production still with three characters sitting on a black leather sofa. On the left is Effie (played by Elizabeth Banks), in a teal dress with hugely puffed sleeves. In the middle is Haymitch (Woody Harrelson), slouched down as far as he can go without falling on to the floor. On the right is Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence), wearing plain black and white clothing, with her knees pulled up to her chest.]
My hopes are rising dangerously high for this movie. Every still I’ve seen is perfect. I mean, look at Effie’s ridiculousness. Look at Haymitch’s IDGAFness. Look at Katniss remade to Beauty Base Zero. The only quibble I might have is that the anglular grey coffee table looks a little Star Trek: The Next Generation 1988, but who cares?

popculturebrain:

New Image: The Hunger GamesCollider

[Image: production still with three characters sitting on a black leather sofa. On the left is Effie (played by Elizabeth Banks), in a teal dress with hugely puffed sleeves. In the middle is Haymitch (Woody Harrelson), slouched down as far as he can go without falling on to the floor. On the right is Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence), wearing plain black and white clothing, with her knees pulled up to her chest.]

My hopes are rising dangerously high for this movie. Every still I’ve seen is perfect. I mean, look at Effie’s ridiculousness. Look at Haymitch’s IDGAFness. Look at Katniss remade to Beauty Base Zero. The only quibble I might have is that the anglular grey coffee table looks a little Star Trek: The Next Generation 1988, but who cares?

"Hi, my name is Seth Rogen and I’m currently trying to conceal a massive erection."

Seth Rogen standing next to Kate Beckinsale.  (via popculturebrain)

Rape culture, exhibit #930,312,300,222,304,878,223.

guardiancomment:

- Photograph: Bloomberg via Getty Images
The media misreported a riot outside an Apple store in Beijing last week, but had they dug a little deeper they would have seen it as yet another example of Chinese factory workers producing products for technology giants finally standing up for their rights. Lijia Zhang writes:

I felt the pain of my fellow workers because I, too, slaved for 10 years  at a factory and endured its strict rules. The restrictions at my  state-owned factory, however, paled in comparison to those of  cold-hearted capitalism.
Read the rest here

guardiancomment:

- Photograph: Bloomberg via Getty Images

The media misreported a riot outside an Apple store in Beijing last week, but had they dug a little deeper they would have seen it as yet another example of Chinese factory workers producing products for technology giants finally standing up for their rights. Lijia Zhang writes:

I felt the pain of my fellow workers because I, too, slaved for 10 years at a factory and endured its strict rules. The restrictions at my state-owned factory, however, paled in comparison to those of cold-hearted capitalism.

Read the rest here

(via meloukhia)

tranqualizer:

[photo set: moving images of Martin Luther King Jr delivering a sermon a day before his assassination. Text reads, “somebody told a lie one day. they couched it in language. they made everything black, ugly and evil. look in your dictionary and see the synonyms for the word black. it’s always something degrading, low and sinister. look at the word white. it’s always something pure, high, clean. well, I wanna get the language right tonight.”]

noonaneomuhomo:

lusts:

The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education

The white-washing of MLK jr. and the civil rights movement on a whole to make history look kindly upon white folk and convince POC of the disempowering lie that is “Be polite, nice, & don’t challenge us & you’ll get your rights” is one that disgusts me to no end.

It’s always funny to see that Malcolm X is pitched against MLK on the facet of pro-black/ness… most of their tactics were different, but they were definitely both militantly pro-black.

(Source: aladdinsdick)

[Image: A fortune-cookie-style piece of paper that reads: “Night people: ‘Anybody who goes to bed the same day they got up is a quitter.’”]

[Image: A fortune-cookie-style piece of paper that reads: “Night people: ‘Anybody who goes to bed the same day they got up is a quitter.’”]

(Source: nadiaface, via trudymade)

Fatties on Ice episode #21: Wurst Case Cynario
In which we discuss: Mindy Kaling, aging, street harassment, Oddities, and Jimmy Kimmel’s Halloween pranx.

Fatties on Ice episode #21: Wurst Case Cynario

In which we discuss: Mindy Kaling, aging, street harassment, Oddities, and Jimmy Kimmel’s Halloween pranx.

[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

cwnl:

Sagan Day (Nov. 9th) celebrations in full effect

Tunes of CWL

Vangelis- Cosmos (TV Theme)

HAPPY CARL SAGAN DAY

(via itsfullofstars)

Tags: carl sagan

TW: Rape

wolfenisa:

If I was to steal a chocolate bar because it was sitting at the counter looking all tasty, it’d be theft. Nobody would say but oh, look at the creamy picture on the packaging. It was taunting him. He had no choice. It was instinct. Impulse. Drives and desires beyond his control.

If I walked into some person’s home and said I lived there, I’d be arrested. Nobody would say to the owners that they should invest in curtains so that people couldn’t see how nice their house was so easily. Nobody would tell them that they were ‘asking for it’

And if I beat a guy up because he was a loud mouth I’d be charged. Nobody would say oh but look at him, he’s a dick. He’s got gel in his hair and he’s wearing a shirt that says “How about a nice cup of shut the fuck up”. The dude is a wanker, he got what he deserved. More importantly, even if they did say that, it wouldn’t effect my charges. 

But if a woman is wearing a short skirt then it will dramatically sway people’s opinions in a rape case. Was it cut above the knee? Was your waist showing? These are serious questions that will be asked in a court case. 

I donno if I’ve missed something from the past few decades, but I’m pretty sure the whole “look what she was wearing, she was asking for it” thing is a pure joke now. No one in their right mind listening to a rapist pull that excuse would give them any sort of sympathy. It’s not an excuse in any way, just like this post says about stealing or beating someone up, even though this post is doing it sarcastically as if to say we do accept the excuse for rape. I disagree that it still stands. Maybe back in a day when before the 60s or so, but certainly not today. If it is still used then please show me and I’ll be one of the first to tear that legal establishment apart piece by piece. 

Here is an example from this calendar year. Please, sir, commence your tearing.

(Source: marxisforbros)